top of page

Search Results

329 results found for "whole lafferty"

  • "And Mad Undancing Bears" (1972/1974)

    Most readers, sooner or later, will ricochet off some part of Lafferty. This is where the giant motorcyclist Whole-Hog McCloud rides out, giving us some of Lafferty’s best writing Lafferty pushes affect to the point of decision. Lafferty wanted to do more. Another one for the Lafferty playlist.

  • "Nor Limestone Islands" (1971)

    That is superior Lafferty. Surely catnip for Lafferty. a stalwart champion of Lafferty’s reputation. reach for Jonathan Swift rather than for the broader Western tradition of floating islands and the whole Lafferty has a word for Weberian people.

  • Totalizing

    It’s Down the Slippery Stairs” A few quick notes on being totalizing: I believe readers need a total Lafferty But in Lafferty’s case, you lose something essential by ignoring it outright. In the same way, Lafferty totalized because he was an old-fashioned Catholic—and Catholic  means universal The irony is that people haven’t yet assembled enough of the logocentric Lafferty even to deconstruct Lafferty, as we know, disliked Marxists.

  • "The Hand of the Potter: An Idyll" (1984/2020)

    Lafferty readers must have been excited for a new Lafferty. No Lafferty readers seem to understand it. This is where Lafferty shoots his flare gun. is an esoteric writer in the whole. Lafferty owned IHR material that said it was. Now think about the Holocaust, which Lafferty denied.

  • "Jack Bang's Eyes" (1976/1983)

    Now we must apply what we have said of the part to the whole living body. For the same relation must hold of the whole of sensation to the whole sentient body as obtains between It is a little criminal, given how little Lafferty cared about making a great deal of money. Lafferty writes that Jack’s eyes “broke then, and gushed away in two scarlet streams.” Lafferty writes that Jack is dizzy and feverish, surrounded by coruscations and flame.

  • “Calamities of the Last Pauper” (1982)

    Another thing Lafferty is doing here is pushing his ongoing critique of media. Lafferty knew that Rerum Novarum  (1891) set the foundation for modern Catholic social thought. In Bochtan’s death, Lafferty gives us the worst version of both. This isn’t an oversight; it’s the whole point. While Lafferty often pulls against definitive endings, here the lack of closure suggests, at least to

  • "The Wagons" (1959)

    And then the wheels start rolling, rolling, rolling, ur-Lafferty, Lafferty’s most primitive version of traits and actions cohere into an intelligible whole by way of trace. Lafferty throws that out the window. He can hear, in the groan and rattle of approach, not just a wagon but a whole train of them, each with with the tongue “pegged” to the undercarriage or axle so that turning becomes a matter of dragging the whole

  • "Tongues of the Matagorda" (1979/1982)

    Many Lafferty readers know about the existence of Esteban . Lafferty mentioned it. He makes for a good Lafferty protagonist. Lafferty is writing to his own novel's pattern. This is what the whole passage looks like in Esteban : There is a break here which we cannot fill Dorantes began to laugh as he had not for a year, and he declared that he had a whole life left such

  • "The Emperor's Shoestrings" (1974/1997)

    Justin, being a Lafferty hero, becomes distracted. Death is puzzling in Lafferty. But while there are brutal, stony deaths in Lafferty, more often death is less grim than it is in almost It just doesn’t work that way in Lafferty. Parts outlive the whole: a head is lobbed off and talks. Lost states return, often improbably.

  • "The Effigy Histories" (1975/1984)

    .” — Thomas Aquinas Advanced Lafferty today. “ The Effigy Histories” is one of my favorite Lafferty stories Lafferty gives us Karl Effigy, a young man and former juvenile delinquent. Arithmetic is Lafferty’s limit case. The big joke here is the one the story ends on. For Lafferty, the ultimate stakes of this must be religious. That makes him an extremely weird moderate foundationalist, one who can appeal to both the whole-hog

  • "I Don't Like You"

    This is another prenucleation Lafferty story that uses the police interrogation to pattern its plot. In “I Don’t Like You,” Lafferty gives the reader a Dr. Lafferty’s character Joe Spade seems pretty close to Lafferty himself when he talks about a "head-grifter At the same time, Lafferty is not completely hostile to psychology. Someone online said years ago that dissociation in Lafferty is a result of Laffery’s own alcoholism.

  • "Something Rich and Strange" (1985/1986)

    ” — Lafferty, interview Lafferty repeatedly said that he swore off writing on his seventieth birthday Lafferty is called cartoonish. She is a nother of Lafferty's Whores of Babylon. And Lafferty makes it nearly impossible to miss the whole point of it by placing the word hell  in the “Something Rich and Strange” is not Lafferty at his best, but it is Lafferty at the very end of his writing

bottom of page