Lafferty's Planets: An Axilological Orrery
- Jon Nelson
- Nov 2
- 6 min read
Updated: 23 hours ago

Some notes on Lafferty's planets, especially for those new to Lafferty.
As a kid, I loved the idea of Heinlein’s Future History, Poul Anderson’s Technic Civilization, and Niven’s Known Space. Lafferty won't give you anything like that. More often than not, his planets are hyper-concentrated ideas taken to their logical and hyperbolic extremes, a kind of planetary monomania. Each world is its central concept: Pudibundia is Politeness so absolute it becomes dangerous; Skandia is Overpopulation; Bellota is Cosmic Joke; Paleder World is Pseudo-Perfection as a Dead End; and so on. This is closer to the parade of emblems one finds in The Faerie Queene than to the Instrumentality of Mankind.
At some point, Lafferty decided to patch together a universe—one that, to my eye, first really comes together in his story "World Abounding" (1971)—building it up from what he had already written and from the synthesis of human mythology, folklore, and theology that was always his stock-in-trade. His planets are chunks of what has been called the cauldron of story. The inhabitants of Analos are the original gargoyles, and the giants on Lamos are, basically, Laestrygonians. Lafferty’s version of planetary romance is to reimagine the Garden of Eden as a con job on the un-catechized. The result is that his planets are allegorical nodes, and his universe is a moral orrery.
How unsurprising, then, that the laws governing that orrery are metaphysical and psychological. Reality itself can be subjectively conditioned, as on Aeaea or Robinsonnade, or puzzlingly undecidable, as on Bellota. Wherever you are in this universe, conceptual principles will be governing you: Floating Justice, the Doomsday Equation, Phelan’s Corollary, and so on.
In Lafferty’s approach to planetary science fiction, there isn't much concern for seamless canon. As in all his work, there are multiple, surging fronts of reality, overlapping, diverging, cross-pressuring, and contradicting one another. At the center of this inventiveness is a constant variable: Earth, an ambiguous anchor. It is failed first chance, the cosmic prison of evil (Pandora World, Hell Planet), the meanest of worlds and source of sickness, the backward baseline against which all others are measured, for all of them are schizo-gashes of earth.
May there be more inhabited worlds than one? Whet not your knives at me, people! You thought that the question was answered forever in the affirmative, did you? And if one does not give the required affirmative answer to the Establishment, that is the end of him? We will see. — “More Worlds Than One?” (1979)
Cosmological Principles



